Authorized Push Payment and Social Engineering: How to Fight Back
Authorized Push
Payment and Social Engineering Scams
When fraud happens as
due to scams and social engineering, businesses will have a difficult time
stopping it. This
is due to the fact that when legitimate clients fall victim to fraudsters on
the internet, for instance, when it comes to the authorized Push Payment Fraud
(APP)--the consequences of losses could be devastating, not only for the
individual victim but also the business where the fraud occurred.
According to FTC,
American consumers have reported losing more than $2.3B to fraudsters in 2021. In the meantime, across the
Atlantic, UK Finance revealed that the losses incurred due to
authorized push fraud increased by 71% during the first quarter of the year
2021 UK The same report states that the amount that was stolen from this type
of scam was even greater than the losses incurred by card fraud.
In the end, financial
institutions have to come up with ways to fight the massive losses that are
triggered by APP fraud, before they end up to pay the cost.
Protecting Your
Organization Against Scams and Social Engineering
Of the many types of
frauds that companies attempt to stop fraud, social engineering and scams are a
few that pose unique problems. The
main reason for this is because the criminals don't interact with the company's
digital assets directly. Instead, they communicate with the business through
the user who falls for the fraud.
This makes it difficult
to identify this kind of fraud prior to it happening since those who fall for
scams are able to easily bypass biometrics and authentication challenges
because they're using their accounts. Security measures like the multi-factor
authentication (MFA) as well as identity verification aren't of much usefulness
in this case. Financial
institutions have to consider how they can successfully engage directly with
the user to stop APP fraud from occurring and also at what point on the path
this type of intervention is required.
Layered Defenses and
Adaptive Access
The prevention of fraud
is usually targeted at two important stages of the user's experience: both at
the time of authentication as well as during the transaction. If the person is authentic and can
authenticate to their account without difficulty and this leaves an account as
your primary security measure. It's
common to obtain additional approvals in order for large amounts of money,
however this won't prevent a fraudulent customer from making costly error.
It is vital to keep in
mind that consumer education is still vital in forming the primary security
against fraudsters. However,
it is important to note that consumer education is not going to completely
remove the problem. Fraudsters
can be tricky and smart and even a skeptical customer can be swindled in
the event that they are addressed in the right way in the right timing. Therefore, financial institutions need to
create an effective second protection plan to protect those instances where
consumers are unaware that they have been scammed.
There are many options
to tackle this issue and a smart business could implement a number options to
offer an enhanced defense. First
of all it is important to look at user behaviour throughout all of the
sessions. When authenticating and
finishing the transaction, users can perform a range of actions like making
adjustments to their profile, or even viewing and altering PII. Although most biometrics based on
behavioral focus on separating legitimate users from those taking over accounts
however, a genuine user might be able to exhibit unusual behavior due to the
influence of a scammer. If
the fraud detection and risk detection tools are in operation during the user's
session there is more opportunity to identify these irregularities and take the
appropriate action.
However, to stop this
kind of fraud, it's not enough to just focus on detection. Instead, financial institutions have to
figure out an effective way to stop the fraud and force the user to be more
aware of their actions. This
is more difficult to say than done, however it can be achieved by altering the
user's experience according to the perceived risks. Instead of making the request for MFA on
top of an untrustworthy transaction, it's better to confront your user's
thinking in a new manner to make them consider the actions they take.
Most often, the person
who is committing the fraud has already made significant efforts in order to
make the user believe in them, however the victim can be forced to doubt their
trust. People who seem to be
in danger of approving a fraudulent transaction may be steered down a different
route: instead of having immediate acces for the "transfer" button,
it may be sufficient to provide the user with a warning message that alerts
them to possible fraud. It asks them a series of questions about the way
they're able to identify the person who is paying, if they're sure of the
amount they're paying and so on.
Sometimes, urging the
customer to stop , and think about it will stop the payment from going through.
Technology Change vs.
Policy Change
The majority of
companies have several counter-fraud strategies and tools in place. Fraud prevention generally is
multi-faceted and includes new security measures over existing ones to stay
up-to-date with new methods and techniques used by fraudsters. However, the process of adding new
technologies or making major changes to existing tools takes time and money as
well as various approvals.
This is due to the fact
that changes control procedures and management can be extremely rigid, putting
banks in tough situation. Fraudsters
are not weighed down by other institutions and are able to move quickly,
leading teams of fraud to feel that they're not able to keep up. Knowing the tools to stop scams as well
as social engineering, and using them are two distinct things.
Financial institutions
can overcome this particular problem by moving their fraud policies from
individual applications to a central fraud hub, which allows rapid and simple
policy changes without the use of code. With this system in place, fraud
departments can modify their policies in response to fraud in a variety of
methods, including mitigation options which do not rely as much on the standard
tools such as MFA and identity verification, and more on different types of
problems. The benefit of this
strategy is that it's simple to monitor the effectiveness of these policies,
evaluating and tweaking as needed in real-time.
Ping's Integrated
Approach to Stopping Scams and Social Engineering
Social engineering and
scams are challenging to combat But the proper combination of strategies and
tools can guarantee that your business is up to the challenge.
Ping Identity takes an
integrated method to preventing fraud that combines tools for fraud detection,
decision-making mitigation, orchestration, and detection all within one system. Our fraud orchestration and decisioning
tools enable organizations to combine fraud signals from a range of sources
such as Ping's own detection tools and third party ones. They also then build
out policies that provide flexibility in mitigation at any time through the
user experience. Implementing
and testing new policies in the decision building hub can be simple and simple,
and our fraud prevention specialists are prepared to share their expertise in
preventing loss due to fraud. APP frauds as well as social engineering.
DIGITAL DEVICES LTD
Long before Apple set an average
consumers mindset to replacing their handheld gadgets in two years, Digital Devices Ltd believed in Moore's law that computing will double every two
years. With our heritage from the days of IBM Personal Computer XT, our
founders have gone through the technology advancements of the 1990s and 2000s
realizing that technology is an instrumental part of any business's success.
With such a fast pace industry, an IT department can never be equipped with the
tools and training needed to maintain their competitive edge. Hence, Digital
Devices has put together a team of engineers and vendor partners to keep up
with the latest industry trends and recommend clients on various solutions and
options available to them. From forming close relationships with networking and
storage vendors like Juniper, SolarWinds and VMWare to
high-performance computing by HPE or AWS Cloud solutions, Digital Devices
Limited offers the latest technology solutions to fit
the ever-growing needs of the industry.
Our experts can guide you through the
specifications and build cost efficiencies while providing high end,
state-of-the-art customer services. We research and analyses market and its
current demand and supply chain by offering wide range of bulk supplies of
products like AKG C414 XLII, Shireen Cables DC-1021, Shireen Cables DC-2021,
Dell p2419h monitor, Dell U2419H, Dell P2719H, Dell P2219H,
Lenovo 62A9GAT1UK, LG 65UH5F-H and
Complete IT Infrastructure products and services.
Comments
Post a Comment